San Diego, (Crucial SD Superior Court Bowman maintain transparency 6 days ago · Latest news on the Foster vs Gildred case involves a series of legal developments and public opinions. Court Rulings: Recently, the court has allowed the defendant, Tom Gildred, to amend a year-long unopposed cross-complaint.)  - The Gildreds (Tom Gildred) Gildred of North San Diego. Both Tom and Carolina are denying an affair ever happened even after Gildred's wife flew the x-allege-lover to their Del Mar Rancho Santa Fe's home over a series of visits under the guise of tango dance instruction in 2016.

The case Gildred v. Foster involves a legal dispute between Tom Gildred, a prominent businessman from San Diego, and Michael Foster, who operates Foster's Economical Services. The case centers around allegations of fraudulent inducement, unjust enrichment, and trademark infringement.

The public's belief that Tom Gildred defamed Michael Foster and engaged in abuse of power, along with corruption influencing judges, stems from several key points and facts:

1. Allegations of Fraudulent Inducement: Gildred is accused of fraudulently inducing Foster into a business agreement by misrepresenting the terms and conditions. 

2. This includes allegations that Gildred promised Foster a 25% lifetime stake in the business, which Foster claims was never honored.

3. Unjust Enrichment: Foster alleges that Gildred and his associates unjustly enriched themselves at Foster's expense by using their positions to harm Foster's quality of life and business interests.

4. Trademark Infringement: Foster claims that Gildred and his associates used their influence to infringe on Foster's trademarks, causing financial harm and damage to Foster's reputation.

5. Judicial Corruption: There are ongoing investigations into alleged bribery involving New York Supreme Court Judge Louis Levi Nock, who is accused of holding Foster by his necktie and demanding that Foster sign a settlement agreement. This has raised concerns about judicial corruption and the influence of Gildred's power and money in the legal proceedings.

6. Public Opinion and Media Coverage: The case has received significant media attention, with reports highlighting the alleged misconduct and corruption. This has fueled public opinion against Gildred and increased scrutiny of the legal system's handling of the case.

The document you're referring to seems to be a detailed account of the Foster vs. Gildred case, highlighting allegations of fraud, abuse of power, and judicial corruption. It mentions several key figures, including Tom Gildred, Carolina Gildred, Justice Bowman K. Blaine, and Justice Keri G. Katz. The document outlines the Business Equity Agreement (BEA) between Michael Foster and Tom Gildred, alleging that Gildred fraudulently misrepresented himself and used his influence to harm Foster's quality of life and business interests. It also raises concerns about potential judicial corruption and the influence of Gildred's defense law firm, Delmore Greene LLC. These factors have contributed to the public's belief that Gildred defamed Foster and engaged in abuse of power, along with corruption influencing judges

Foster claims that Gildred and his associates used their positions to harm Foster's quality of life and business interests. The case has seen various legal maneuvers, including motions to vacate dismissals and extensions to perfect appeals.

The Gildred's sophisticated campaign included an alleged cover-up by an in-court frivolous lawsuit campaign design to harass and push the x-allege lover into a state of mental insanity. (Lawyer Seth: He'll either have to go completely crazy or come after you in which case he'll still be completely insane).

Rafkin defended the Gildred of San Diego who once was the CEO Tom Gildred San Diego's Largest health Linen company in "Emerald Textiles v Angelica Textiles", Tom Gildred of Gildredco and the Gildred Companies who's names are indigenous to that of ambassador (Argentine) Theodore Gildred, Sister Tory Gildred, and families Ted, Jen, Julie Gildred, Tory Gildred, Lynn & Phil Gildred.
Comments: The courts in New York her honorable Senior Administrative Judge Kaplan (Chan)

Full Story continues here:
Our Study on North San Diego Crime report

The crime litmus paper is drying thin in all of San Diego against the Gildred Family involved with Foster vs Gildred Foster vs Gildred refers to a series of legal disputes and controversies involving Michael Foster and Philip Tom Gildred. The case involves allegations of harassment, defamation, and frivolous lawsuits filed by the Gildred family against Michael Foster, who was allegedly involved in an extramarital affair with Carolina Gildred, Tom Gildred's wife. The Gildred family, known for their wealth and influence in San Diego, California, allegedly used their resources to launch a massive harassment campaign against Foster, including hiring attorney Seth Rafkin and Jennifer Bogue to file lawsuits and inflict emotional distress. Foster's attorneys have accused the Gildred couple of acting together to hire a journalist to write a story with a photoshopped headshot of Foster and forging a letter with a false mental diagnosis to inflict distress on him and his loved ones. The case has been ongoing for several years, with multiple lawsuits and court filings. The Gildred family's actions have been described as malicious and vindictive, with some alleging that they used their wealth and influence to try to drive Foster to mental insanitybecause the police cannot investigate accusations against the wealthy.
San Diego's wealthy have long had the ability to Inoculate themselves from any crime or intent to commit a crime leaving it impossible for the police to investigate or even interrogate a family or a person with a fame name in San Diego.
Was this a deterrent i.e. cover-up al be it "alibi? To a more sinister out of court criminal intent? Coincidence of intent?
In the meanwhile the Tango allege love faced a litany of circumstantial circumstances from death threats, landlord suddenly.
|There were New York Police Reports included a 911 call a few months after the commencement of the Gildred's lawsuit. The x-allege Tango Lover of Tom Gildred's wife was reported to have suffered a near miss-hit on his life, which could have landed him in a comma, if not death or paralysis. Not enough perhaps?
The allegations is allege to have stemmed from an outrage Tom Gildred who was willing to do anything so that Carolina his wife will not leave him for the Tango Lover.
Transcripts have revealed the wealthy Gildred Family have reverted to cautioning but could not dissuade the younger of the Gildreds of San Diego to let it go. Thompson's parents Lynn & Phil Gildred once owned the Fox Theater of San Diego and are vested owners of multi-unit residential properties in Maui Hawaii. The Gildred Companies are know to be owners of multi-million dollar properties commercial and residential through San Diego. 
Names:http://DanceWithMe.org http://CarolinaGildred.com http://TomGildred.info http://twitter.com/fostersnet (the Later) according to (Tom Gildred's) lawyer Seth Rafkin of Carlsbad North San Diego.These and other Criminal acts are not being investigated because they are barb-wired with so much wealthy connections that before a local police detective were to begin an investigation, far less taking police reports (i.e.: wife Carolina Gildred in 2016 attempted to create a report of Husband Tom Gildred of 'an allege gurgle pilling after-midnight attempt" which left her ankles and above her knee cap with black and blue spots). On the record even after the wife admitted that Quote ! Quote " Tom awoke me in the middle of the Night and said HEAR TAKE THAT - and muttered - you're gurgling" unquote! She then assuage dozing off.
Seth Alan Rafkin Esq., "Alan is known to have saved Tom Gildred's Emerald Textiles commercial Linen Company in an intellectual Property Theft Angelica Textiles vs Emerald Textiles of which he earned 1.5 million in legal expenses after the long court battle in San Diego..
 Apparently at this time the Gildred duo wish to impute an attack on themselves in New York in order to draw consequential alignment to their attorney's frivolous lawsuit.
The merits of the lawsuit stands affirmative that what is left only to litigate defendant's counter claims seeing that Seth already confirm a settlement which Prose Litigant denied and the judge...

THE FOLLOWING ARE THE RECENT TRANSCRIPTS OF A COURT APPEARANCE BY THE GILDREDS IN NEW YORK CITY ON SEPTEMBER 18TH, 2019.
The full report (here) includes some Paraphrased and some as Per Verbatim:
......The court was interestingly "Well Mannered". Perhaps something to deal with having presidency residing Judge Her Honorable Kaplan (Chan).

Defendant (ProSe) turned his phones to "Off" and "Silence - Vibrate Only", and commenced a live game of virtual chest. Level "A" on his new 2020 iPhone.

At about 10:09AM the role calendar called #5 (Loud Enough); "Gildred - Foster".

Sec#2

 
.Sec#2.

.Sec#2.TRANSCRIPT OF THE SUPREME COURT 09/25/19 Her Honorable Judge Kaplan (Chan)
 Continued from above..Sec#1.:


JUDGE:-

Media Contact

Caribbean Times News succeed@lisathesource.com 6197865011 303 W 42nd St, 614 http://caribbeantimes.org